HEADGEAR and KANTO

What is Post-Traumatic Modernism?

PTM is a secular reaction to philosophical anality. An intellectual fusillade perpetrated from behind, a canonical sodomy that produces a bastard philosophical child. PTM isn’t comely or benevolent, but brash, imprudent and forgetful. It is insuppressible angry, petulant, Cyclopedic in it’s close-mindedness, and forever restless. PTM is childish, surly and unkind. It is unthinking, and wary of outside demonical intruders and highbrow intellectualizations. Post mudhens tend to be soporific, unreasonable and full of themselves. The Critique of Cynical Reason is, well, cynically unenlightened. Jargon Harems, (Jurgen Habermas for the uninitiated) while a genius, is a postmodern example of social intercourse caromed off kilter, a signifier without a signified, a philosophical cupboard gone bare. Teutonic postmodernism, while infinitely appealing and often delightful, is replete with non-sequesters (septicidal pleonastic recidivism) neologisms and tiresomely banal dithering. What I am suggesting (conjectures, disjunction and hand-clapping aside), is a simple Maypole modernism, a pre-post postmodernism that has no childish attachments to Russell, Moore, or Cambridge inkpots. A non-sycophantic, self indulgent, socially irresponsible trope of philosophical cutthroats whose sole driving force is the total abject deconstruction of social construction. What I am suggesting, then, is a joyous Deleuzian sodomy, the sterilization of canon, Kanto and all meta-philosophical discourses on post modernity. I thank you all for your patience, even temper, brash impudence, and, as it is, Odyssean ears.