Could there have been a boy in the hat, well of course, yes indeed. As all men in hats are preceded by boyhood, it seems reasonable that a boy in a hat precedes a man in a hat. There is a natural regress that starts from birth and ends with demise, the cessation of breath and life; in between conception and demise lies the in between, the place where hats and umbrellas exist, the place of beginnings and endings. So it stands to reason that the boy in the hat preceded the man in the hat, a natural regress from beginning to middle to end. Remember, if you recall, that I am simply remembering this for someone who wishes to remain anonymous, without beginning, middle or end. In this manner, and this manner alone, regress and progress are one in the same, cut from the same broadcloth, so to speak, and can be interchanged with one another with grammatical impunity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Stephen Rowntree
- "Poetry is the short-circuiting of meaning between words, the impetuous regeneration of primordial myth". Bruno Schulz
Blog Archive
Links
- Windows Tuneup
- Apmonia: A Site for Samuel Beckett
- Bywords.ca
- Dublin Time and Day
- fORT/dAfORT/dA
- Google News
- John W. MacDonald's Weblog
- New York Freudian Society
- Sigmund Freud-Museum Wien-Vienna
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Taking the Brim _ Took the Broom
- The Blog of Amanda Earl
- The Brazen Head: A James Joyce Public House
1 comment:
Interesting. Like the rhythm to the cycle.
Didn't know you had a blog.
Post a Comment